lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250310175946.c317afa1ae89540cb1076940@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:59:46 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark
 Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
 <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] tracing: Show last module text symbols in
 the stacktrace

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 19:46:27 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:43:57 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Since the previous boot trace buffer can include module text address in
> > the stacktrace. As same as the kernel text address, convert the module
> > text address using the module address information.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  Changes in v2:
> >   - Add LRU based removed module information override.
> 
> I don't think we should bother supporting removal of modules yet.
> 
> It also makes this patch way too complex for what it should do.
> 
> >   - Fix to move module_delta initialization after tr->scratch check.
> 
> >   - Fix to make mod_delta on all loaded modules correctly.
> 
> Should be a separate patch.
> 
> >   - (Note, I don't add uname check yet)
> >   - Fix mod_addr_comp() overflow issue.
> >   - Add pr_info() when failed to allocate module_delta.
> 
> So basically this patch should just add the code to handle finding the
> module for stack traces. Not to mention, I have code that depends on that,
> but this patch currently does way to much.
> 
> Can you just send a patch that adds the trace_adjust_address() (although, I
> would shorten it to "trace_addr_adjust()").
> 
> And add what is needed to update the trace_stack_print().
> 
> You can base it off of the ring-buffer/for-next branch.

OK, BTW, if we always need tscratch, we can move module_delta in it.
Let's reimplement it.

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/trace.c        |  173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  kernel/trace/trace.h        |    4 +
> >  kernel/trace/trace_output.c |    3 -
> >  3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ