linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250310090319.olwxrcqczwjla2jm@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:33:19 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in
 cpumask.h

On 10-03-25, 11:45, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-03-25, 12:05, Yury Norov wrote:
> > >  /**
> > > - * cpumask_weight - Count of bits in *srcp
> > > + * cpumask_weight - Count of bits in *@...p
> > >   * @srcp: the cpumask to count bits (< nr_cpu_ids) in.
> > 
> > Here nr_cpu_ids is also a variable. Why you don't prefix it with @?

Hmm, I thought @ is applied only to function arguments. Not sure what
should be done with nr_cpu_ids.

Akira ?

-- 
viresh