linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] arch: arm64: qcom: sc7280: Remove optional elbi register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250310-pristine-idealistic-husky-1e57b2@krzk-bin>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:32:30 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, 
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com, quic_mrana@...cinc.com, quic_vpernami@...cinc.com, 
	mmareddy@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] arch: arm64: qcom: sc7280: Remove optional elbi
 register

On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 11:15:25AM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> ELBI registers are optional registers which are not used by this
> platform. So removing the elbi registers from PCIe node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 3 +--


Please use standard email subjects, so with the PATCH keyword in the
title. 'git format-patch -vX' helps here to create proper versioned patches.
Another useful tool is b4. Skipping the PATCH keyword makes filtering of
emails more difficult thus making the review process less convenient.

That's a v5 and still wrong... Can you pass the patchset through
internal review first?

Best regards,
Krzysztof