[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db5726b6-9320-8f53-7e26-31c1a755dc12@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:35:54 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix potential null dereference in ext4 test
on 3/7/2025 7:54 PM, Charles Han wrote:
> kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without
> NULL check may lead to NULL dereference.
> Add a NULL check for test_state
>
> Fixes: b7098e1fa7bc ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_free_blocks")
> Fixes: ac96b56a2fbd ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_mark_used")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> index bb2a223b207c..d634c12f1984 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> @@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
> grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
> bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
>
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> @@ -860,6 +861,7 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
> grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
> bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
>
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
Good catch, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists