[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8676rcaq6h4X8To@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:16:10 +0100
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thangaraj.S@...rochip.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
Rengarajan.S@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
phil@...pberrypi.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net: usb: lan78xx: Convert to PHYlink
for improved PHY and MAC management
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:11:29AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:58:38AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Hi Thangaraj,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:29:45AM +0000, Thangaraj.S@...rochip.com wrote:
> > > > - mii_adv_to_linkmode_adv_t(fc, mii_adv);
> > > > - linkmode_or(phydev->advertising, fc, phydev->advertising);
> > > > + phy_suspend(phydev);
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why phy_suspend called in the init? Is there any specific reason?
> >
> > In my tests with EVB-LAN7801-EDS, the attached PHY stayed UP in initial
> > state.
>
> Why is that an issue?
The local interface was in the administrative DOWN state, but link was up:
- port LEDs are on
- link partner sees the link is UP.
It is not a big deal, but for me it looks inconsistent.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists