lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250310104910.27210B18-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:49:10 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/uapi: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in
 uapi headers


On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:26:57AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> __ASSEMBLY__ is only defined by the Makefile of the kernel, so
> this is not really useful for uapi headers (unless the userspace
> Makefile defines it, too). Let's switch to __ASSEMBLER__ which
> gets set automatically by the compiler when compiling assembly
> code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 5 +++--
>  arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/schid.h  | 4 ++--
>  arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/types.h  | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> index bb0826024bb95..ea202072f1ad5 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@
>  #define PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS		21
>  #define PTRACE_SYSEMU			31
>  #define PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP	32
> -#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
>  #include <linux/stddef.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>

...

Did this cause any sorts of problems? I can see this pattern all over
the place, so why is this now a problem?

Also, wouldn't it be better to fix this with an sed statement in
scripts/headers_install.sh instead? Otherwise this is going to be a
never ending story since those things will be re-introduced all the
time.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ