lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z87Tj5BryQd9Rya8@pavilion.home>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:57:03 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 10/18] posix-timers: Make lock_timer() use guard()

Le Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 05:48:34PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> @@ -63,9 +63,18 @@ static struct k_itimer *__lock_timer(tim
>  
>  static inline void unlock_timer(struct k_itimer *timr)
>  {
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&timr->it_lock);
> +	if (likely((timr)))
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&timr->it_lock);
>  }
>  
> +#define scoped_timer_get_or_fail(_id)					\
> +	scoped_cond_guard(lock_timer, return -EINVAL, _id)

I'm not really fond of the fact this hides a return.

But anyway:

Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ