[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f01f71b-284b-4841-bda9-a3934cb4efc8@web.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:17:56 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dpu: reorder pointer operations after sanity
checks to avoid NULL deref
…
> Fix this by reordering the dereference after the sanity checks.
Can another wording approach (like the following) be more appropriate?
Thus move the assignment of the variable “dpu_enc” behind …
Would an other summary phrase become nicer?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists