lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qriquzbudggauxqm5oz55zvkh3uhpk5icx6icnacyzzijdtivr@m37pbcwiqblb>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:46:16 +0530
From: Brahmajit <brahmajit.xyz@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, johannes.berg@...el.com, 
	ilan.peer@...el.com, miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com
Subject: Possible Null pointer dereferences in net/mac80211/parse.c

Coverity Scan reports that there might be a possible NULL pointer
dereferences in net/mac80211/parse.c: 1061 in
ieee802_11_parse_elems_full(). I understand that these reports are not
always correct.

I'm not sure whether the syntax
struct ieee80211_elems_parse_params sub = {};
is correct or falls under C11 standard[0].

initializer:
         assignment-expression
         { initializer-list }
         { initializer-list , }
initializer-list:
         designation(opt) initializer
         initializer-list , designation(opt) initializer

I'm aware that C23 allows empty initialization[1].

braced-initializer:
                    { }
                    { initializer-list }
                    { initializer-list , }

Considering [0], if we do something like

--- a/net/mac80211/parse.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/parse.c
@@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ ieee80211_mle_defrag_epcs(struct ieee80211_elems_parse *elems_parse)
 struct ieee802_11_elems *
 ieee802_11_parse_elems_full(struct ieee80211_elems_parse_params *params)
 {
-       struct ieee80211_elems_parse_params sub = {};
+       struct ieee80211_elems_parse_params sub = { 0 };
        struct ieee80211_elems_parse *elems_parse;
        const struct element *non_inherit = NULL;
        struct ieee802_11_elems *elems;

Would it be incorrect? Would appreciate some feedback.

[0]: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf
[1]: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3054.pdf
-- 
Regards,
Brahmajit

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ