linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mm-unstable 0/2] mseal system mappings fix + s390 enablement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24152d85-12e3-45ea-8d6e-c492dd4b94db@lucifer.local>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:30:11 +0000
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable 0/2] mseal system mappings fix + s390
 enablement

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:21:14PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 02:09:30PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > When it comes to unmapping vdso: this would break user space since
> > > commit df29a7440c4b ("s390/signal: switch to using vdso for sigreturn
> > > and syscall restart") - there haven't been any reports.
> >
> > OK that seems to implicitly suggest that you're fine with sealing then?
> >
> > I had a quick glance and it seemed fine for s390. I mean it's _weird_ to remap
> > any of this stuff so it'd be the odd one out that does it (ppc _seems_ to in
> > _some_ circumstances need it, for instance).
> >
> > So I think we're good? :)
>
> Yes, for s390 we are good.

Awesome :) series otherwise looks good.