[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47f6713b-b751-4791-9059-a128dd1fc71d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:25:37 +0530
From: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, ukleinek@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, vz@...ia.com,
piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pwm: Convert lpc32xx-pwm.txt to YAML schema
On 11/03/25 18:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/03/2025 13:57, Purva Yeshi wrote:
>> Convert the existing `lpc32xx-pwm.txt` bindings documentation into a
>> YAML schema (`lpc32xx-pwm.yaml`).
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> Add SPDX license identifier `(GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)`.
>
> That's not a change in the binding.
>
>> Define `$id` and `$schema` fields for proper schema validation.
>> Set `title` to describe the LPC32XX PWM controller.
>
> Neither these.
>
>> Add maintainers as per `scripts/get_maintainer.pl` output.
>
> These should not be subsystem maintainers.
I have removed the subsystem maintainers and included only relevant ones:
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com>
>
>> Reference `pwm.yaml#` in `allOf` to inherit common PWM properties.
>
> Not a change to the binding.
>
>>
>> Define properties:
>> Restrict `compatible` to `"nxp,lpc3220-pwm"` using `const`.
>> Limit `reg` to `maxItems: 1` to ensure a single register range.
>> Set `"#pwm-cells"` to `const: 3` for expected PWM cell properties.
>>
>> Mark `compatible` and `reg` as required properties.
>
> So it wasn't before? What are you implying here?
The compatible and reg properties were already present in the .txt file,
but in a different format. I initially kept the commit message for them
but have now removed it.
>
>> Set `unevaluatedProperties: false` to enforce strict validation.
>>
>> Validate the YAML schema using dt-validate and yamllint.
>
> None of above is suitable for commit msg.
I have removed all commit message parts you mentioned.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@...il.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.yaml | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
> Where is the conversion?
Apologies for the confusion. I missed removing lpc32xx-pwm.txt. I'll
delete it in the next version to properly reflect the conversion.
>
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..3e41cd291
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/nxp,lpc32xx-pwm.yaml#
>
> Filename matching compatible.
In the lpc32xx-pwm.txt file, the compatible property was defined as
"nxp,lpc3220-pwm", so I have kept it the same. To ensure consistency
between the filename and compatible, should I rename the file to
nxp,lpc3220-pwm.yaml?
>
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: LPC32XX PWM controller
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - "Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>"
>> + - "Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>"
>> + - "Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com>"
>
> Look at other bindings - none of them use quotes.
>
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> + - $ref: pwm.yaml#
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + const: nxp,lpc3220-pwm
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + "#pwm-cells":
>> + const: 3
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> +
>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + pwm@...5c000 {
>> + compatible = "nxp,lpc3220-pwm";
>> + reg = <0x4005c000 0x4>;
>> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
>> + };
>> + - |
>> + pwm@...5c004 {
>> + compatible = "nxp,lpc3220-pwm";
>
> One example is enough.
Okay. I'll remove the second example and keep only one in the next version.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Best regards,
Purva Yeshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists