[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9BcO-CEDHqegZvD@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:52:27 -0400
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: Yunjeong Mun <yunjeong.mun@...com>
Cc: kernel_team@...ynix.com, Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>,
harry.yoo@...cle.com, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rakie.kim@...com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com, horen.chuang@...ux.dev, hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Don't create weight sysfs for
memoryless nodes
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 06:51:45PM +0900, Yunjeong Mun wrote:
> Hi Gregory, thanks for kind explanation.
>
> We believe our propsed hot plug patch should be added as a hot-fix to v6.14,
> because it can be addressed independently of auto-configuring feature.
> Rakie will send v2 patch soon.
>
I think having the answer to at least the following question documented
is needed. I'll wait for v2 to do another review.
> > 2) We need to clearly define what the weight of a node will be when
> > in manual mode and a node goes (memory -> no memory -> memory)
> > a) does it retain it's old, manually set weight?
> > b) does it revert to 1?
> >
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists