[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174170950664.2288726.14708796433249812313.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:11:46 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>, Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf mem: Don't leak mem event names
On Fri, 07 Mar 2025 17:28:53 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> When preparing the mem events for the argv copies are intentionally
> made. These copies are leaked and cause runs of perf using address
> sanitizer to fail. Rather than leak the memory allocate a chunk of
> memory for the mem event names upfront and build the strings in this -
> the storage is sized larger than the previous buffer size. The caller
> is then responsible for clearing up this memory. As part of this
> change, remove the mem_loads_name and mem_stores_name global buffers
> then change the perf_pmu__mem_events_name to write to an out argument
> buffer.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists