lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40d1a27e-aee9-bd68-a82b-a51ef8ccde05@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:17:06 +0530
From: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Dikshita Agarwal
	<quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio
	<konradybcio@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: media: qcom,sm8550-iris: update power
 domain name


On 3/11/2025 11:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/03/2025 13:03, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>> Not all platforms has a collapsible mx, so use the more generic naming
>> of mx in the binding.
>>
> 
> No, neither tested, nor justified. Read the file. How many platforms do
> you have there? One. Out of this one platform you claim not all of them
> have MX collapsible, so you want MX?
Let say we have one which is non-collapsible, what should be the way in that
case to use the bindings which differ only in the MX/MXC part ?
Regards,
Vikash
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ