[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250311201450.61d48787@akair>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:14:50 +0100
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: vigneshr@...com, aaro.koskinen@....fi, khilman@...libre.com,
rogerq@...nel.org, tony@...mide.com, jmkrzyszt@...il.com,
andi.shyti@...nel.org, reidt@...com, wsa@...nel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: omap: fix IRQ storms
Am Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:29:04 +0100
schrieb Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>:
> > This needs at least to be tested on systems where false acks were
> > detected.
>
> Which do you mean? You did test this on GTA04A5, or?
>
Exactly the tests which Nishanth did. So I would say with his Tested-By,
this patch is good to go. I test on GTA04A5 but there and on any other
system I have I did not observe the false acks but there I have the IRQ
storm. And I want a solution which avoids the IRQ storm and also does
not reintroduce the false acks.
Regards,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists