lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5d3ef28-7321-4bb1-955a-8f9b53b13c2a@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 21:59:29 +0100
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux@...ssschuh.net" <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
 Kurt Borja <kuurtb@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mcgrof@...nel.org,
 russ.weight@...ux.dev, dakr@...nel.org,
 "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: In-kernel parser for the BMOF format used by WMI-ACPI

Am 11.03.25 um 21:13 schrieb Pali Rohár:

> On Tuesday 11 March 2025 21:06:16 Armin Wolf wrote:
>>   - Is there any way to check whether the Doublespace compression algorithm is still encumbered by patents?
> Linux kernel 2.2 or 2.4 had full read/write support for doublespace
> compression algorithm in mainline kernel and it was connected with fat
> driver. IIRC it was dropped for kernel 2.6 because nobody ported that
> vfat code to new fs API and hence doublespace in-kernel compression
> algorithm was not needed/used anymore. But I do not remember details.
>
> So IMHO it should not be a problem to reintroduce same code into kernel
> again if there is a new need for it.
>
> And in my project I reused the doublespace compression code from old
> Linux kernel.

AFAIK only the CVF code used by the dmsdos driver was inside the mainline kernel,
but not the dmsdos driver itself.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ