[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9DKxOnxr1fSv0On@calendula>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:44:04 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 nf 00/15] bridge-fastpath and related improvements
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 09:22:35AM +0100, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>
>
> On 3/5/25 11:29 AM, Eric Woudstra wrote:
> > This patchset makes it possible to set up a software fastpath between
> > bridged interfaces. One patch adds the flow rule for the hardware
> > fastpath. This creates the possibility to have a hardware offloaded
> > fastpath between bridged interfaces. More patches are added to solve
> > issues found with the existing code.
>
>
> > Changes in v9:
> > - No changes, resend to netfilter
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
> I've changed tag [net-next] to [nf], hopefully you can have a look at
> this patch-set. But, after some days, I was in doubt if this way I have
> brought it to your attention. Perhaps I need to do something different
> to ask the netfilter maintainer have a look at it?
Apologies, this maintainance service is best effort.
I am also going to be very busy until April to complete a few more
deliverables, I cannot afford more cancelled projects. I will try to
collect what is left for net-next and wait for the next merge window.
Therefore, I suggest you start with a much smaller series with a
carefully selected subset including preparatory patches. I suggest you
start with the software enhancements only. Please, add datapath tests.
As for the hardware offload part, I have a board that I received 4.5
ago years as a engineering sample that maybe I can use to test this,
but no idea, really.
You are a passer-by (ahem, "contributor"), this will get merged
upstream at some point and we will have to maintain all this new code
without your help maybe ... (people change bussiness units...), I have
to understand what is going on here. The throughput available is
limited, I am afraid we can only go _slow and careful_.
Thanks.
P.S: You work is important, very important, but maybe there is no need
to Cc so many mailing lists and people, maybe netdev@,
netfilter-devel@ and bridge@ is sufficient.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists