[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250311094014.0cd4f495b31f25405f3c380e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:40:14 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark
Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tracing: Remove checking the activity when module
map is updating
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:21:37 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:58:56 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> >
> > Remove unnecessary active check because tr->flags already checks it.
>
> I've thought this over, and sure, if we start tracing on a persistent ring
> buffer, then it can add all modules loaded from then on even if it it's not
> tracing.
>
> Can you merge patches 1 and 2, rebase it on ring-buffer/for-next and
> resubmit this as one patch?
Oops, I've missed this message. OK, let me rebase it.
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists