[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba8dedbc-9a5f-4038-ad51-2b20baa6af65@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:45:20 +0800
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>, Andi Kleen
<ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] perf x86 evlist: Update comments on topdown
regrouping
On 3/11/2025 5:25 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:39:05PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
>> From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Update to remove comments about groupings not working and with the:
>> ```
>> perf stat -e "{instructions,slots},{cycles,topdown-retiring}"
>> ```
>> case that now works.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> Dapeng, can I get your Signed-off-by here?
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
>> index ed205d1b207d..7905a28d7734 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
>> @@ -39,28 +39,13 @@ int arch_evlist__cmp(const struct evsel *lhs, const struct evsel *rhs)
>> * 26,319,024 slots
>> * 2,427,791 instructions
>> * 2,683,508 topdown-retiring
>> - *
>> - * If slots event and topdown metrics events are not in same group, the
>> - * topdown metrics events must be first event after the slots event group,
>> - * otherwise topdown metrics events can't be regrouped correctly, e.g.
>> - *
>> - * a. perf stat -e "{instructions,slots},cycles,topdown-retiring" -C0 sleep 1
>> - * WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
>> - * Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
>> - * 17,923,134 slots
>> - * 2,154,855 instructions
>> - * 3,015,058 cycles
>> - * <not supported> topdown-retiring
>> - *
>> - * If slots event and topdown metrics events are in two groups, the group which
>> - * has topdown metrics events must contain only the topdown metrics event,
>> - * otherwise topdown metrics event can't be regrouped correctly as well, e.g.
>> - *
>> - * a. perf stat -e "{instructions,slots},{topdown-retiring,cycles}" -C0 sleep 1
>> + * e. slots event and metrics event are in a group and not adjacent
Yes, here is my SoB.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
BTW, It seems there is a typo and missed the "not" word. It should beĀ
"slots event and metrics event are not in a group and not adjacent"
Thanks.
>> + * perf stat -e "{instructions,slots},cycles,topdown-retiring" -C0 sleep 1
>> * WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
>> - * Error:
>> - * The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for
>> - * event (topdown-retiring)
>> + * 68,433,522 slots
>> + * 8,856,102 topdown-retiring
>> + * 7,791,494 instructions
>> + * 11,469,513 cycles
>> */
>> if (topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics() &&
>> (arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs) || arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs))) {
>> --
>> 2.49.0.rc0.332.g42c0ae87b1-goog
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists