[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed700b54-8599-4775-b07f-43c7d62ae722@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:36:37 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui
<rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] dt-bindings: clock: brcm,kona-ccu: Add BCM281xx
bus clocks
On 10/03/2025 21:20, Artur Weber wrote:
> On 10.03.2025 10:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 08:50:42AM +0100, Artur Weber wrote:
>>> Add bus clocks corresponding to peripheral clocks currently supported
>>> by the BCM281xx clock driver and add the relevant clock IDs to the
>>> clock/bcm281xx.h dt-bindings header.
>>
>> Please squash the patch so we see complete change.
>
> Squash which patch(-es)? Both CCU bindings and the dt-bindings header
> are modified in this patch, as outlined in the commit message (though
> now that I look at it, I could reword the first sentence to specifically
> imply "add bus clocks *to the binding*"...). What is missing?
If I got it correctly, you are changing the same lines in bindings in
two patches, so squash these two patches.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists