[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250311091803.31026-2-ceggers@arri.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:18:03 +0100
From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: check that dummy regulator has been probed before using it
Due to asynchronous driver probing there is a chance that the dummy
regulator hasn't already been probed when first accessing it.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
---
v2:
- return -EPROBE_DEFER rather than using BUG_ON()
drivers/regulator/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 4ddf0efead68..4276493ce7c6 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2069,6 +2069,10 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
if (have_full_constraints()) {
r = dummy_regulator_rdev;
+ if (!r) {
+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto out;
+ }
get_device(&r->dev);
} else {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to resolve %s-supply for %s\n",
@@ -2086,6 +2090,10 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
goto out;
}
r = dummy_regulator_rdev;
+ if (!r) {
+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto out;
+ }
get_device(&r->dev);
}
@@ -2213,6 +2221,8 @@ struct regulator *_regulator_get_common(struct regulator_dev *rdev, struct devic
*/
dev_warn(dev, "supply %s not found, using dummy regulator\n", id);
rdev = dummy_regulator_rdev;
+ if (!rdev)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
get_device(&rdev->dev);
break;
--
2.44.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists