linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] device property: Split fwnode_get_child_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025031151-camcorder-sandstone-bd1c@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:05:55 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jakob Riepler <jakob+lkml@...anoidlabs.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] device property: Split fwnode_get_child_node_count()

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:00:16PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The new helper is introduced to allow counting the child firmware nodes
> > of their parent without requiring a device to be passed. …
> 
> See also:
> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc6#n94
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> 

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot