[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <711b5e47-ed20-45a2-a912-42db5491a25f@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:16:46 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Christoph Lameter
<cl@...ux.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/10] slab: add sheaf support for batching
kfree_rcu() operations
On 2/24/25 09:40, Harry Yoo wrote:
>> +static bool kfree_rcu_sheaf(void *obj)
>> +{
>> + struct kmem_cache *s;
>> + struct folio *folio;
>> + struct slab *slab;
>> +
>> + folio = virt_to_folio(obj);
>> + if (unlikely(!folio_test_slab(folio)))
>> + return false;
>
> Does virt_to_folio() work for vmalloc addresses?
Hm, no. Good catch.
> Probably it should check is_vmalloc_addr() first?
Yes, thanks!
> Otherwise look good to me.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists