[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABqG17hBviQ64jXgZ1fa5+ir37YPyK62LZvMgrSGADOxSTFo-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 22:26:10 +0530
From: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
To: Gyorgy Sarvari <skandigraun@...il.com>
Cc: openembedded-devel@...ts.openembedded.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph" <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] meta-openembedded: flashrom: Update to v1.4.0
Hi
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 22:09, Gyorgy Sarvari <skandigraun@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 12.03.25 17:03, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> > Hi Gyorgy,
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 19:47, Gyorgy Sarvari <skandigraun@...il.com> wrote:
> >> On 12.03.25 12:19, Naresh Solanki via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> >>> -Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/51960]
> >>> -Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>
> >>> -Change-Id: I55c4e8529d36f0850dd56441c3fb8602c5d889fd
> >>> +Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream
> >> Is that really the case? I mean it is just being updated to a new
> >> version, it doesn't look that inactive. That PR seems to be abandoned by
> >> the submitter at the first superficial sight, is this not the case?
> > Yes. its being inactive for long time.
> The last commit date in the main branch of
> https://review.coreboot.org/flashrom is "Sat Mar 1 19:19:16 2025 +1100"
> - less than 2 weeks ago, with last release just before Christmas. It's
> not as busy as Yocto, but doesn't look abandoned.
>
> Or am I looking at a wrong repo?
Your right.
I can work on flashrom 1.5.1 release. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Naresh
> >>> +
> >>> +EXTRA_OEMESON="-Dbash_completion=disabled -Dtests=disabled"
> >> Nitpick: Could you please fix the whitespaces around the equal sign?
> > Sure.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists