lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9670400b-4723-4028-b5ae-5005ed3766c1@grabatoulnz.fr>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:11:03 +0100
From: Eric <eric.4.debian@...batoulnz.fr>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
 Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org>,
 regressions@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
 Dieter Mummenschanz <dmummenschanz@....de>
Subject: Re: Regression from 7627a0edef54 ("ata: ahci: Drop low power policy
 board type") on reboot (but not cold boot)

Hi Niklas

Le 11/03/2025 à 15:14, Niklas Cassel a écrit :
> Hello Hans, Eric,
>
> Eric, could you please run:
> $ sudo hdparm -I /dev/sdX | grep "interface power management"
>
> on both your Samsung and Maxtor drive?
> (A star to the left of feature means that the feature is enabled)

Here is the result (apparently PM is enabled on the maxtor but it 
doesn't create the same problem) :

(trixieUSB)eric@...ihir:~$ sudo hdparm -I 
/dev/disk/by-id/ata-MAXTOR_STM3250310AS_6RY2WB82 | grep "interface power 
management"
        *    Device-initiated interface power management
(trixieUSB)eric@...ihir:~$ sudo hdparm -I 
/dev/disk/by-id/ata-Samsung_SSD_870_QVO_2TB_S5RPNF0T419459E | grep 
"interface power management"
        *    Device-initiated interface power management

>
>
> One guess... perhaps it could be Device Initiated PM that is broken with
> these controllers? (Even though the controller does claim to support it.)
>
> Eric, could you please try this patch:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> index f813dbdc2346..ca690fde8842 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static const struct ata_port_info ahci_port_info[] = {
>   	},
>   	[board_ahci_sb700] = {	/* for SB700 and SB800 */
>   		AHCI_HFLAGS	(AHCI_HFLAG_IGN_SERR_INTERNAL),
> -		.flags		= AHCI_FLAG_COMMON,
> +		.flags		= AHCI_FLAG_COMMON | ATA_FLAG_NO_DIPM,
>   		.pio_mask	= ATA_PIO4,
>   		.udma_mask	= ATA_UDMA6,
>   		.port_ops	= &ahci_pmp_retry_srst_ops,
Will do. I'll report back as soon as I've built the modified kernel and 
tested it.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Niklas

Kind regards

Eric


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ