linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] gpio: elkhartlake: depend on MFD_INTEL_EHL_PSE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z9HTU2BlXIa95S0V@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:32:51 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, giometti@...eenne.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	raymond.tan@...el.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] gpio: elkhartlake: depend on
 MFD_INTEL_EHL_PSE_GPIO

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:03:01PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 01:00:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 08:37:26AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 10:52:28AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > Now that we have Intel MFD driver for PSE GPIO, depend on it.
> > 
> > > Andy, any guidance on GPIO?
> > 
> > I'm not sure what we are waiting here from me. Hadn't I reviewed your GPIO
> > part already?
> 
> Ah, I added MFD dependency for leaf drivers after your v1 review.
> So this one seems missing the tag. Can I add it?

I see, but this can be added later on.
And on the second thought, do we accept the configurations
when user wants to have GPIO on EHL, and doesn't care about TIO?
Maybe this patch is not needed after all?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko