lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250312192811.7632a936@pumpkin>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:28:11 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Linus Torvalds
 <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Christophe Leroy
 <christophe.leroy@....fr>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
 nnac123@...ux.ibm.com, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 2/8] test_hexdump: Create test output data from the
 binary input data buffer

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:31:10 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 09:34:46AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > Using the same data that is passed to hex_dump_to_buffer() lets
> > the tests be expanded to test different input data bytes.  
> 
> Do we really need to kill the static test cases?
> Are they anyhow harmful?
> 

I was asked to add some extra tests for other byte values.
The static result buffers just get in the way.

They are also not necessary since the tests are comparing the output
of two (hopefully) different implementations and checking they are
the same.

	David


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ