linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ACPI: PNP: Add Intel OC Watchdog IDs to non-PNP device list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iBcxGcqp88kHN64WddvmC-y6F1XaFeSNHFYuQnayg7dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:31:22 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@...mens.com, 
	benedikt.niedermayr@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ACPI: PNP: Add Intel OC Watchdog IDs to non-PNP
 device list

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 4:46 PM Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com> wrote:
>
> With the kernel having an ACPI driver for these watchdog devices add
> their IDs to the known non-PNP device list. Note that this commit is
> not a complete list of all the possible watchdog IDs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
> index 01abf26764b00c86f938dea2ed138424f041f880..3f5a1840f573303c71f5d579e32963a5b29d2587 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
> @@ -355,8 +355,10 @@ static bool acpi_pnp_match(const char *idstr, const struct acpi_device_id **matc
>   * device represented by it.
>   */
>  static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_nonpnp_device_ids[] = {
> +       {"INT3F0D"},
>         {"INTC1080"},
>         {"INTC1081"},
> +       {"INTC1099"},
>         {""},
>  };
>
>
> --

Is there a particular reason for this patch?