[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9H7RYEI_cPwNe7h@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:23:17 -0700
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: arm64: Reload PMCNTENSET_EL0
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 08:56:00PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> Disable counters that are no longer included in PMCNTENSET_EL0. It is
> not necessary to enable counters included in PMCNTENSET_EL0 because
> kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr() does so if appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> index 2d19c6048091..b14655dda6db 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> @@ -831,6 +831,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reload_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> u64 mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu);
>
> + kvm_pmu_disable_counter_mask(vcpu, ~__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCNTENSET_EL0));
> +
Just so this function appears consistent, can we move this after the
point where the mask is applied?
There's no functional impact of course since PMCR_EL0.N can only be
changed before the VM is started, i.e. not possible to have running
counters >= N.
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists