lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250312051958.GA11824@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:19:58 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, kbusch@...nel.org, sagi@...mberg.me,
	loberman@...hat.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, emilne@...hat.com, bgurney@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nvme-multipath: add the NVME_MULTIPATH_PARAM
 config option

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:35:40PM -0400, John Meneghini wrote:
>> What's the point of adding yet another confusing option?
>
> If you'll read the kConfig description, hopefully it's not confusing.

It still is.

> The whole point of this patch series is to remove the core.nvme_mulipath parameter.

Why would a compile time option be preferable over a runtime one?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ