[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9EkDKi8XrwD-i_0@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:05:00 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Cc: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
jgg@...pe.ca, peterhuewe@....de, sudeep.holla@....com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Build error on -next due to tpm_crb.c changes?
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 05:51:17PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 11.03.25 16:53, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > On 3/11/25 10:21 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 05.03.25 18:36, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > [...]
> > So, it should not be possible on one had have
> > CONFIG_TCG_ARM_CRB_FFA being true when building tpm_crb.c
> > and false resulting in the tpm_crb_ffa.o not being
> > picked up in the build.
>
> Many thx for the answer. Maybe Fedora's way to prepare the .config files
> (which my package builds use to be close to Fedora's official packages)
> is doing something odd/wrong. Will take a closer look and report back.
I don't have bandwidth for analysing the kconfig issue (except pointing
out those obvious issues that I spotted).
> Ciao, Thorsten
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists