[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9E1AwaFni3o00sZ@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:17:23 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, cem@...nel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@...il.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in
xfs_file_write_iter()
> +void
> +xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(
> + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> + unsigned int *unit_min,
> + unsigned int *unit_max)
> +{
> + if (!xfs_inode_can_atomicwrite(ip)) {
> + *unit_min = *unit_max = 0;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + *unit_min = *unit_max = ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
This is a rather ugly interface. Why not have separate helpers for
the min and max values that can just return the actual values?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists