[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9E679YhzP6grfDV@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:42:39 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, cem@...nel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@...il.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment
hint
> else if (ap->datatype & XFS_ALLOC_USERDATA)
> align = xfs_get_extsz_hint(ap->ip);
> +
> + if (align > 1 && (ap->flags & XFS_BMAPI_EXTSZALIGN))
> + args->alignment = align;
> +
Add a comment please.
> +/* Try to align allocations to the extent size hint */
> +#define XFS_BMAPI_EXTSZALIGN (1u << 11)
Shouldn't we be doing this by default for any extent size hint
based allocations?
> bool found;
> bool atomic_sw = flags & XFS_REFLINK_ATOMIC_SW;
> + uint32_t bmapi_flags = XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK |
> + XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC;
> +
> + if (atomic_sw)
> + bmapi_flags |= XFS_BMAPI_EXTSZALIGN;
Please add a comment why you are doing this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists