[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9FnZzBQuZ1j5k3I@bogus>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:52:23 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for
scmi cpufreq
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:23:12AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:12:45AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> >
> > So it is clear that wrong fw_devlink is created, it is because scmi cpufreq device is
> > created earlier and when device_add, the below logic makes the fwnode pointer points
> > to scmi cpufreq device.
> > if (dev->fwnode && !dev->fwnode->dev) {
> > dev->fwnode->dev = dev;
> > fw_devlink_link_device(dev);
> > }
> >
>
> Thanks, looks like simple way to reproduce the issue. I will give it a try.
>
I could reproduce but none of my solution solved the problem completely
or properly. And I don't like the DT proposal you came up with. I am
not inclined to just drop this fwnode setting in the scmi devices and
just use of_node.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists