[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532d9f9b-e4d0-4050-b01d-730259535d5e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:00:43 +0100
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, Michal Kubiak
<michal.kubiak@...el.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Paolo
Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, "Daniel
Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 11/16] idpf: prepare structures
to support XDP
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:12:08 -0800
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 17:21:27 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * idpf_xdp_is_prog_ena - check if there is an XDP program on adapter
>> + * @vport: vport to check
>> + */
>> +static inline bool idpf_xdp_is_prog_ena(const struct idpf_vport *vport)
>> +{
>> + return vport->adapter && vport->xdp_prog;
>> +}
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf.h:624: warning: No description found for return value of 'idpf_xdp_is_prog_ena'
Breh, I swear I ran sparse and kdoc... >_<
>
> The documentation doesn't add much info, just remove it ?
Ack, agree.
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists