linux-kernel - Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] meta-openembedded: flashrom: Update to v1.4.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66b24018-0b7e-42b6-ad86-d80f37538678@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:17:52 +0100
From: Gyorgy Sarvari <skandigraun@...il.com>
To: naresh.solanki@...ements.com, openembedded-devel@...ts.openembedded.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph" <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] meta-openembedded: flashrom: Update to
 v1.4.0

On 12.03.25 12:19, Naresh Solanki via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> -Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/51960]
> -Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>
> -Change-Id: I55c4e8529d36f0850dd56441c3fb8602c5d889fd
> +Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream
Is that really the case? I mean it is just being updated to a new
version, it doesn't look that inactive. That PR seems to be abandoned by
the submitter at the first superficial sight, is this not the case?
> +
> +EXTRA_OEMESON="-Dbash_completion=disabled -Dtests=disabled"
Nitpick: Could you please fix the whitespaces around the equal sign?