linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PCI: imx6: Use domain number replace the hardcodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9GYm/jp9VIhCEeY@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:22:19 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
	"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	"kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>,
	"manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PCI: imx6: Use domain number replace the hardcodes

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 09:28:02AM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 12.03.2025 um 04:05 +0000 schrieb Hongxing Zhu:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> > > Sent: 2025年3月11日 23:55
> > > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > > Cc: robh@...nel.org; krzk+dt@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org;
> > > shawnguo@...nel.org; l.stach@...gutronix.de; lpieralisi@...nel.org;
> > > kw@...ux.com; manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> > > s.hauer@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> > > linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; imx@...ts.linux.dev; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> > > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PCI: imx6: Use domain number replace the
> > > hardcodes
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:11:04AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> > > > > Sent: 2025年3月10日 23:11
> > > > > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > > > > Cc: robh@...nel.org; krzk+dt@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org;
> > > > > shawnguo@...nel.org; l.stach@...gutronix.de; lpieralisi@...nel.org;
> > > > > kw@...ux.com; manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org;
> > > bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> > > > > s.hauer@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com;
> > > > > devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > > imx@...ts.linux.dev; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> > > > > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PCI: imx6: Use domain number replace the
> > > > > hardcodes
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:42:56AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > > > > Use the domain number replace the hardcodes to uniquely identify
> > > > > > different controller on i.MX8MQ platforms. No function changes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 14 ++++++--------
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > > index 90ace941090f..ab9ebb783593 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > > > > > @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
> > > > > >  #define IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE	BIT(11)
> > > > > >  #define IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_VREG_BYPASS		BIT(12)
> > > > > >  #define IMX8MQ_GPR12_PCIE2_CTRL_DEVICE_TYPE	GENMASK(11,
> > > 8)
> > > > > > -#define IMX8MQ_PCIE2_BASE_ADDR			0x33c00000
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  #define IMX95_PCIE_PHY_GEN_CTRL			0x0
> > > > > >  #define IMX95_PCIE_REF_USE_PAD			BIT(17)
> > > > > > @@ -1474,7 +1473,6 @@ static int imx_pcie_probe(struct
> > > > > > platform_device
> > > > > *pdev)
> > > > > >  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > > > >  	struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie;
> > > > > >  	struct device_node *np;
> > > > > > -	struct resource *dbi_base;
> > > > > >  	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> > > > > >  	int i, ret, req_cnt;
> > > > > >  	u16 val;
> > > > > > @@ -1515,10 +1513,6 @@ static int imx_pcie_probe(struct
> > > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > >  			return PTR_ERR(imx_pcie->phy_base);
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -	pci->dbi_base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev,
> > > 0,
> > > > > &dbi_base);
> > > > > > -	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > > > > -		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > > >
> > > > > This makes me wonder.
> > > > >
> > > > > IIUC this means that previously we set controller_id to 1 if the
> > > > > first item in devicetree "reg" was 0x33c00000, and now we will set
> > > > > controller_id to 1 if the devicetree "linux,pci-domain" property is 1.
> > > > > This is good, but I think this new dependency on the correct
> > > > > "linux,pci-domain" in devicetree should be mentioned in the commit log.
> > > > >
> > > > > My bigger worry is that we no longer set pci->dbi_base at all.  I
> > > > > see that the only use of pci->dbi_base in pci-imx6.c was to
> > > > > determine the controller_id, but this is a DWC-based driver, and the
> > > > > DWC core certainly uses
> > > > > pci->dbi_base.  Are we sure that none of those DWC core paths are
> > > > > important to pci-imx6.c?
> > > > Hi Bjorn:
> > > > Thanks for your concerns.
> > > > Don't worry about the assignment of pci->dbi_base.
> > > > If pci-imx6.c driver doesn't set it. DWC core driver would set it when
> > > >  dw_pcie_get_resources() is invoked.
> > >
> > > Great, thanks!  Maybe we can amend the commit log to mention that and
> > > the new "linux,pci-domain" dependency.
> > How about the following updates of the commit log?
> >
> > Use the domain number replace the hardcodes to uniquely identify
> > different controller on i.MX8MQ platforms. No function changes.
> > Please make sure the " linux,pci-domain" is set for i.MX8MQ correctly, since
> >  the controller id is relied on it totally.
> >
> This breaks running a new kernel on an old DT without the
> linux,pci-domain property, which I'm absolutely no fan of. We tried
> really hard to keep this way around working in the i.MX world.

8MQ already add linux,pci-domain since Jan, 2021

commit c0b70f05c87f3b09b391027c6f056d0facf331ef
Author: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Date:   Fri Jan 15 11:26:57 2021 +0800

Only missed is pcie-ep side, which have not been used at all boards dts
file in upstream.

Frank

>
> I'm fine with using the property if present and even mandating it for
> new platforms, but getting rid of the existing code for the i.MX8MQ
> platform is only a marginal cleanup of the driver code with the obvious
> downside of the above breakage.



>
> Regards,
> Lucas