[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <72a4853e7ef36e7c1c4ca171ed4ed8e1a463a61a.1741791691.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:01:31 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] iommu: Don't warn prematurely about dodgy probes
The warning for suspect probe conditions inadvertently got moved too
early in a prior respin - it happened to work out OK for fwspecs, but in
general still needs to be after the ops->probe_device call so drivers
which filter devices for themselves have a chance do do that.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index c6d40abe577e..15a6b3c59ba6 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -437,12 +437,6 @@ static int iommu_init_device(struct device *dev)
ret = -ENODEV;
goto err_free;
}
- /*
- * And if we do now see any replay calls, they would indicate someone
- * misusing the dma_configure path outside bus code.
- */
- if (dev->driver)
- dev_WARN(dev, "late IOMMU probe at driver bind, something fishy here!\n");
if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -565,6 +559,12 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
ret = iommu_init_device(dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /*
+ * And if we do now see any replay calls, they would indicate someone
+ * misusing the dma_configure path outside bus code.
+ */
+ if (dev->driver)
+ dev_WARN(dev, "late IOMMU probe at driver bind, something fishy here!\n");
group = dev->iommu_group;
gdev = iommu_group_alloc_device(group, dev);
--
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
Powered by blists - more mailing lists