[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025031209-provider-docile-fbc3@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:07:15 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fpga: fix potential null pointer deref in
fpga_mgr_test_img_load_sgt()
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 02:01:48PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > zero it out. If the allocation fails then sgt will be NULL and the
> …
> failed?
>
>
> Can a summary phrase like “Prevent null pointer dereference
> in fpga_mgr_test_img_load_sgt()” be nicer?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists