[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff90d3b5-d9c2-4439-ae0a-71edc9865ad2@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:54:30 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: WangYuli <wangyuli@...ontech.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, chenlinxuan@...ontech.com, czj2441@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, guanwentao@...ontech.com,
idosch@...dia.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, niecheng1@...ontech.com, petrm@...dia.com,
zhanjun@...ontech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] mlxsw: spectrum_acl_bloom_filter: Expand
chunk_key_offsets[chunk_index]
On 3/11/25 3:17 PM, WangYuli wrote:
> .../mlxsw/spectrum_acl_bloom_filter.c | 39 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_bloom_filter.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_bloom_filter.c
> index a54eedb69a3f..96105bab680b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_bloom_filter.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_bloom_filter.c
> @@ -203,17 +203,6 @@ static const u8 mlxsw_sp4_acl_bf_crc6_tab[256] = {
> 0x2f, 0x02, 0x18, 0x35, 0x2c, 0x01, 0x1b, 0x36,
> };
>
> -/* Each chunk contains 4 key blocks. Chunk 2 uses key blocks 11-8,
> - * and we need to populate it with 4 key blocks copied from the entry encoded
> - * key. The original keys layout is same for Spectrum-{2,3,4}.
> - * Since the encoded key contains a 2 bytes padding, key block 11 starts at
> - * offset 2. block 7 that is used in chunk 1 starts at offset 20 as 4 key blocks
> - * take 18 bytes. See 'MLXSW_SP2_AFK_BLOCK_LAYOUT' for more details.
> - * This array defines key offsets for easy access when copying key blocks from
> - * entry key to Bloom filter chunk.
> - */
> -static const u8 chunk_key_offsets[MLXSW_BLOOM_KEY_CHUNKS] = {2, 20, 38};
> -
> static u16 mlxsw_sp2_acl_bf_crc16_byte(u16 crc, u8 c)
> {
> return (crc << 8) ^ mlxsw_sp2_acl_bf_crc16_tab[(crc >> 8) ^ c];
> @@ -237,6 +226,7 @@ __mlxsw_sp_acl_bf_key_encode(struct mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_region *aregion,
> struct mlxsw_afk_key_info *key_info = aregion->region->key_info;
> u8 chunk_index, chunk_count, block_count;
> char *chunk = output;
> + char *enc_key_src_ptr;
Please respect the reverse christmas tree order (same in the next patch)
> __be16 erp_region_id;
>
> block_count = mlxsw_afk_key_info_blocks_count_get(key_info);
> @@ -248,9 +238,30 @@ __mlxsw_sp_acl_bf_key_encode(struct mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_region *aregion,
> memset(chunk, 0, pad_bytes);
> memcpy(chunk + pad_bytes, &erp_region_id,
> sizeof(erp_region_id));
> - memcpy(chunk + key_offset,
> - &aentry->ht_key.enc_key[chunk_key_offsets[chunk_index]],
> - chunk_key_len);
Please try instead explicitly cap-ing the loop to the expected
boundaries (0-3)
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists