linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/328] 5.4.291-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <603b3f10-6ad9-46af-8b31-d11e46f4698a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 06:59:24 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
 patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
 jonathanh@...dia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
 rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/328] 5.4.291-rc1 review



On 3/13/2025 12:19 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 20:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.291 release.
>> There are 328 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:56:14 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>          https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.291-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> NOTE:
> The following build errors noticed on arm, arm64 and x86 builds
> net/ipv4/udp.c: In function 'udp_send_skb':
> include/linux/kernel.h:843:43: warning: comparison of distinct pointer
> types lacks a cast
>    843 |                 (!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
>        |                                           ^~
>   Link:
>    - ttps://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/anders/builds/2uDcpdUQnEV7etYkHnVyp963joS/

Yep, this is seen with net/ipv6/udp.c for the same reasons, see my 
comment here:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/0f5c904f-e9e3-405f-a54d-d81d56dc797e@gmail.com/
-- 
Florian