[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9MHOOfnHnLsnhxu@thinkpad>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:26:32 -0400
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, jk@...abs.org, joel@....id.au,
eajames@...ux.ibm.com, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
awalls@...metrocast.net, hverkuil@...all.nl,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
louis.peens@...igine.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
parthiban.veerasooran@...rochip.com, arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alistair@...ple.id.au,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
jonas@...boo.se, jernej.skrabec@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
oss-drivers@...igine.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw,
Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] bitops: Change parity8() return type to bool
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:33:40AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On March 7, 2025 11:30:08 AM PST, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
> >> Instead of "bool" think of it as "bit" and it makes more sense
> >
> >So, to help people thinking that way we can introduce a corresponding
> >type:
> > typedef unsigned _BitInt(1) u1;
> >
> >It already works for clang, and GCC is going to adopt it with std=c23.
> >We can make u1 an alias to bool for GCC for a while. If you guys like
> >it, I can send a patch.
> >
> >For clang it prints quite a nice overflow warning:
> >
> >tst.c:59:9: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'u1' (aka 'unsigned _BitInt(1)') changes value from 2 to 0 [-Wconstant-conversion]
> > 59 | u1 r = 2;
> > | ~ ^
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Yury
>
> No, for a whole bunch of reasons.
Can you please elaborate?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists