[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174188337513.3466761.1103420697284240909.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 09:29:35 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 0/7] perf annotate: Add --code-with-type option
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:49:18 -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> There are roughly two modes in the perf annotate. One is normal code
> annotation and the other is data type annotation. I'm proposing a new
> way to combine the code and data annotation together.
>
> With this option, "# data-type: <name> [offset (field)]" part will be
> added when it found a data type for the given instruction. This is
> for every instruction in the function regardless whether it has a
> sample or not.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists