[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250313-grinning-giraffe-of-holiness-3dbda1@leitao>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:09:01 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
indu.bhagat@...cle.com, puranjay@...nel.org, wnliu@...gle.com,
irogers@...gle.com, joe.lawrence@...hat.com, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, rostedt@...dmis.org, will@...nel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@...zon.com>,
Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Implement HAVE_LIVEPATCH
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 05:27:42PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> This is largely based on [1] by Suraj Jitindar Singh.
>
> Test coverage:
>
> - Passed manual tests with samples/livepatch.
> - Passed all but test-kprobe.sh in selftests/livepatch.
> test-kprobe.sh is expected to fail, because arm64 doesn't have
> KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
> - Passed tests with kpatch-build [2]. (This version includes commits that
> are not merged to upstream kpatch yet).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210604235930.603-1-surajjs@amazon.com/
> [2] https://github.com/liu-song-6/kpatch/tree/fb-6.13
> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@...zon.com>
> Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
PS: I've tested this patchset with the examples from samples/ on a arm64
host, and they worked as expected.
Thanks
--breno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists