[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9NMxr0Ri7VUlJzM@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:23:18 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
To: x86@...nel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"Kaplan, David" <David.Kaplan@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unify IBRS virtualization
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:33:49PM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> To properly virtualize IBRS on Intel, an IBPB is executed on emulated
> VM-exits to provide separate predictor modes for L1 and L2.
>
> Similar handling is theoretically needed for AMD, unless IbrsSameMode is
> enumerated by the CPU (which should be the case for most/all CPUs
> anyway). For correctness and clarity, this series generalizes the
> handling to apply for both Intel and AMD as needed.
>
> I am not sure if this series would land through the kvm-x86 tree or the
> tip/x86 tree.
Sean, any thoughts about this (or general feedback about this series)?
>
> Yosry Ahmed (3):
> x86/cpufeatures: Define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS_SAME_MODE
> KVM: x86: Propagate AMD's IbrsSameMode to the guest
> KVM: x86: Generalize IBRS virtualization on emulated VM-exit
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 11 +----------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists