lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250313221358.26e270db@pumpkin>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 22:13:58 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Anna-Maria Behnsen
 <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>, Pavel Tikhomirov
 <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Cyrill
 Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 14/18] posix-timers: Avoid false cacheline sharing

On Sat,  8 Mar 2025 17:48:42 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> struct k_itimer has the hlist_node, which is used for lookup in the hash
> bucket, and the timer lock in the same cache line.
> 
> That's obviously bad, if one CPU fiddles with a timer and the other is
> walking the hash bucket on which that timer is queued.
> 
> Avoid this by restructuring struct k_itimer, so that the read mostly (only
> modified during setup and teardown) fields are in the first cache line and
> the lock and the rest of the fields which get written to are in cacheline
> 2-N.

How big is the structure?
If I count it correctly the first 'cacheline' is 64 bytes on 64bit
(and somewhat smaller on 32bit - if anyone cares).

But there are some cpu (probably ppc) with quite large cache lines.
In that case you either need to waste the space by aligning the 2nd
part the structure into an actual cache line, or just align the
structure to a 64 byte boundary.

	David

> 
> Reduces cacheline contention in a test case of 64 processes creating and
> accessing 20000 timers each by almost 30% according to perf.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> ---
> V2: New patch
> ---
>  include/linux/posix-timers.h |   21 ++++++++++++---------
>  kernel/time/posix-timers.c   |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> @@ -177,23 +177,26 @@ static inline void posix_cputimers_init_
>   * @rcu:		RCU head for freeing the timer.
>   */
>  struct k_itimer {
> -	struct hlist_node	list;
> -	struct hlist_node	ignored_list;
> +	/* 1st cacheline contains read-mostly fields */
>  	struct hlist_node	t_hash;
> -	spinlock_t		it_lock;
> -	const struct k_clock	*kclock;
> -	clockid_t		it_clock;
> +	struct hlist_node	list;
>  	timer_t			it_id;
> +	clockid_t		it_clock;
> +	int			it_sigev_notify;
> +	enum pid_type		it_pid_type;
> +	struct signal_struct	*it_signal;
> +	const struct k_clock	*kclock;
> +
> +	/* 2nd cacheline and above contain fields which are modified regularly */
> +	spinlock_t		it_lock;
>  	int			it_status;
>  	bool			it_sig_periodic;
>  	s64			it_overrun;
>  	s64			it_overrun_last;
>  	unsigned int		it_signal_seq;
>  	unsigned int		it_sigqueue_seq;
> -	int			it_sigev_notify;
> -	enum pid_type		it_pid_type;
>  	ktime_t			it_interval;
> -	struct signal_struct	*it_signal;
> +	struct hlist_node	ignored_list;
>  	union {
>  		struct pid		*it_pid;
>  		struct task_struct	*it_process;
> @@ -210,7 +213,7 @@ struct k_itimer {
>  		} alarm;
>  	} it;
>  	struct rcu_head		rcu;
> -};
> +} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>  
>  void run_posix_cpu_timers(void);
>  void posix_cpu_timers_exit(struct task_struct *task);
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ static int posix_get_hrtimer_res(clockid
>  
>  static __init int init_posix_timers(void)
>  {
> -	posix_timers_cache = kmem_cache_create("posix_timers_cache", sizeof(struct k_itimer), 0,
> -					       SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
> +	posix_timers_cache = kmem_cache_create("posix_timers_cache", sizeof(struct k_itimer),
> +					       __alignof__(struct k_itimer), SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  __initcall(init_posix_timers);
> 
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ