[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANCG0Gf2ZbnffwNVoBSu_+y4sq0MoMYPwwgsnfg53Pf2enwJZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:22:13 -0700
From: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@...edance.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 7/7] sched/fair: Make sure cfs_rq has enough
runtime_remaining on unthrottle path
It's possible unthrottle_cfs_rq() is called with !runtime_remaining
due to things like user changed quota setting(see tg_set_cfs_bandwidth())
or async unthrottled us with a positive runtime_remaining but other still
running entities consumed those runtime before we reach there.
Anyway, we can't unthrottle this cfs_rq without any runtime remaining
because task enqueue during unthrottle can immediately trigger a throttle
by check_enqueue_throttle(), which should never happen.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@...edance.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index be96f7d32998c..d646451d617c1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6058,6 +6058,19 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
struct sched_entity *se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
+ /*
+ * It's possible we are called with !runtime_remaining due to things
+ * like user changed quota setting(see tg_set_cfs_bandwidth()) or async
+ * unthrottled us with a positive runtime_remaining but other still
+ * running entities consumed those runtime before we reach here.
+ *
+ * Anyway, we can't unthrottle this cfs_rq without any runtime remaining
+ * because any enqueue below will immediately trigger a throttle, which
+ * is not supposed to happen on unthrottle path.
+ */
+ if (cfs_rq->runtime_enabled && !cfs_rq->runtime_remaining)
+ return;
+
cfs_rq->throttled = 0;
update_rq_clock(rq);
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists