[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250313075537.NxNhKauR@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:55:37 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/21] rcuref: Provide rcuref_is_dead().
On 2025-03-13 00:23:11 [-0400], Joel Fernandes wrote:
> This makes sense to me, another way I guess to determine if it is dead is
> actually to do a get() and see if it fails? Though that would be more
> expensive and silly.
good :)
> FWIW for this patch,
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
>
> thanks,
>
> - Joel
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists