linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] TH1520 SoC: Add AON firmware & power-domain support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z9KVD1GKGKPwMR+9@x1>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 01:19:27 -0700
From: Drew Fustini <drew@...7.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>, guoren@...nel.org,
	wefu@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu, alex@...ti.fr, jszhang@...nel.org,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] TH1520 SoC: Add AON firmware & power-domain
 support

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 02:40:05PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 18:20, Michal Wilczynski
> <m.wilczynski@...sung.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch series introduces and documents power management (PM) support and
> > the AON firmware driver for the T-Head TH1520 SoC, as used on the LicheePi 4A
> > board. While part of a larger effort to enable the Imagination BXM-4-64 GPU
> > upstream, these patches can merge independently.
> >
> > Bigger series cover letter:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250219140239.1378758-1-m.wilczynski@samsung.com/
> >
> > This series is versioned to maintain continuity with the bigger patchset it is
> > a subseries of. Please find below a changelog for the AON & power-domain:
> 
> I can pick up patch1 -> patch4 via my pmdomain tree, assuming I can
> get an ack from some of the thead-SoC maintainers.
> 
> Patch5 is probably better to be routed through the SoC maintainers
> tree, but let me know if you prefer me to take this one too.
> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe

Conor - would you be able to take the arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs patch?

Thanks,
Drew