[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60065c0b-4597-4976-b74b-172556c4e156@kwiboo.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 09:22:08 +0100
From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
To: heiko@...ech.de, Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pwm nodes for RK3528
Hi,
On 2025-03-13 08:10, Chukun Pan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> so yes of course the pinctrl needs to be default - simply because
>> that's the only pinctrl state mainline supports.
>
>> But judging by the fact that you're discussing working vs. non-working
>> below, can you please check if we should drop the patch for 6.15 till
>> that is solved?
>
> I suggest dropping this patch first, I will send v2
> when this issue is solved.
I noticed that the pwm nodes and saradc node ended up in wrong mmio
address order, so yes please drop the patch (or reorder nodes) ;-)
Chukun, please get back with more details about the issue you are having.
E.g. a stack trace, what board, DT and U-Boot you are using etc.
I have not seen any issue with PWM using the merged patch having
pinctrl-names=default.
Please see my Linux tree [1] and U-Boot tree [2], those are little ahead
of what has been posted on ML, e.g. it has working USB2.0 host, CPU opp,
Hantro VPU, GPU + opp, arm and logic pwm regulators for E20C, ROCK 2A/2F
and Sige1.
Will try to post USB2.0 host and Hantro VPU patches later today.
CPU opp and GPU + opp depend on PWM and I was planning to post that
together with initial thermal support.
[1] https://github.com/Kwiboo/linux-rockchip/commits/next-20250311-rk3528/
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/contributors/kwiboo/u-boot/-/commits/rk3528
Regards,
Jonas
>
> Thanks,
> Chukun
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists